Healthcare vulnerability to data breach, really?

Business associates, those who handle private patient information for healthcare organizations - including everyone from billing, credit bureaus, benefits management, legal services, claims processing, insurance brokers, data processing firms, pharmacy chains, accounting firms, temporary office personnel, and offshore transcription vendors - are largely unprepared to meet the new data breach related obligations included in the HITECH Act.

HIMSS Analytics announced its findings of a national survey of hospitals and business associates to check the state of healthcare vulnerability to data breach. The research revealed that approximately one-third of business associates surveyed were not aware that they need to adhere to federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy and security requirements, compared to 87 percent of health providers.

Hospitals and health providers are taking action:

• 85 percent of health providers said they will take steps to ensure that data held by business associates will not be breached.
• Nearly half of hospitals, 47 percent, said they would actually terminate their contracts with their business associates for violations.

The research also found that:

• 50 percent of large hospitals experienced at least one data breach this year 68 percent of all hospitals indicated that the HITECH Act’s expanded breach notification requirements will result in the discovery and reporting of more incidents, and 57 percent reported that they now have a greater level of awareness of data breaches and breach risk
• 90 percent indicated they have changed or plan to change policies and procedures to prevent and detect data breaches.

“This study highlights the tremendous risk exposure for healthcare organizations” said Bob Gregg, CEO of ID Experts. “Despite an increase in risk assessments conducted, data breach is on the rise and patients are at a high risk level for medical identity theft and fraud where an unknown person will use an identity to illegally receive benefits or services."

NOTE: Physical security technology is also needed to document company policies and procedures. For example: Install cameras over all financial transaction devices, trash receptacles and shredders to be sure they are used properly and regularly according to policy. We are all about changing behavior’s that increase vulnerability within the organization. When we install the right technology in the right place and we follow up on the use of the technology we can get the behaviors’ we want and minimize the liability and IT risks we face every day.

Harris Poll Shows 96 Percent of Americans Support Uses of Video Surveillance to Counteract Terrorism

A recent Harris Poll survey indicates that 96 percent of U.S. citizens feel the federal government and law enforcement agencies should be able to use video surveillance in an effort to counteract terrorism and help protect U.S. citizens in specific public places. Four out of five adults feel that in extreme cases, such as a terrorist attack, the government should be able to use any available means to protect citizens, and more than half (54 percent) of U.S. adults are even willing to put a portion of the government’s stimulus funds toward setting up video surveillance to help reduce crime.


The results are at odds with current perceptions about the use of video surveillance, by revealing that only a small minority of Americans is concerned about the federal government or law enforcement agencies using surveillance cameras to monitor public places. That Americans don't mind being watched is especially relevant in light of the recently exposed domestic terror plot in Boston, and subsequent FBI intelligence indicating that Al Qaida recruits are reportedly being encouraged to perform acts of terrorism inside the U.S.

However, citizen support of video surveillance rests on the assumption that more cameras will result in more secure environments, but that isn’t the case. Recently, the security staff at the George Washington Bridge in New York City—responsible for monitoring bridge cameras and security kiosks—was photographed sleeping on the job. Thus, camera proliferation alone (The New York Times estimates that London has more than 4.2 million closed-circuit TV cameras) will not solve the problem. Many of these cameras go completely unmonitored because there are simply not enough human eyes available to watch all of the video feeds.

“The widespread adoption of video-camera technology has not made the job of the security officer any easier, nor has it helped obtain actionable intelligence before an intrusion,” said John Frazzini, President of Houston-based Behavioral Recognition Systems, Inc. (BRS Labs), and a former Secret Service agent.

Adds Frazzini, “We have been working with high-level security customers in the U.S. and around the world to put a new approach to work—behavioral analytics. Ten days after the terrorist attacks in Mumbai last Thanksgiving, a major international hotel installed BRS Labs’ software, AISight™ (pronounced eye sight), which was designed to autonomously monitor hundreds of cameras simultaneously, and to provide real-time actionable intelligence. In just a few days the hotel’s security staff was able to improve the safety of the hotel’s perimeter. We are also deployed in several high-security U.S. locations including seaports, power plants, nuclear plants, and global financial institutions.”

“Traditional video surveillance approaches have failed because they ignore the fact that every environment is unique,” said Ray Davis, founder of BRS Labs. “These methods also require expensive, labor-intensive programming to define specific objects or activities a system should look for, so unexpected security incidents are missed,” said Davis. “Any new technology approach to video surveillance must deliver the right level of protection and the right level of privacy from small, simple deployments to the most complex security environments without human intervention required.”

AiSight takes visual input from a camera, learns what activities and behaviors are typical, and generates real-time alerts when it identifies activities that are not normal. It is a reasoning-based surveillance technology that functions in a manner similar to the human brain. It takes in external visual input (computer vision), while its machine learning engine observes the scene, learns and recognizes behavioral patterns and responds accordingly. Surveillance is 24/7, and since the software learns the scene, the false positives are greatly reduced.

http://www.securityinfowatch.com/node/1313836

http://www.securityinfowatch.com/node/1313836

Posted using ShareThis

http://www.securityinfowatch.com/node/1313844

http://www.securityinfowatch.com/node/1313844

Posted using ShareThis

AMF Bowls for Customers with Video Sharing Over Managed IP - CIO.com - Business Technology Leadership

AMF Bowls for Customers with Video Sharing Over Managed IP - CIO.com - Business Technology Leadership

Posted using ShareThis

Oberthur Technologies and Graphic Security Systems Corporation Enhance Physical

Oberthur Technologies and Graphic Security Systems Corporation Enhance Physical

Lowers & Associates Announces New Casino/Gaming Strategic Advisory Service

Lowers & Associates Announces New Casino/Gaming Strategic Advisory Service